![]() |
![]() |
Lloyd's to Offer Terrorism |
00 |
00 |
WASHINGTON DC, March 19- Lloyd’s, the famed London underwriter, has an interesting new way for average Americans to prepare themselves for the dangerous world we now live in. They call it "terror insurance." Lloyd’s new product, rolled out for the first time here today in the nation's capitol, is aimed at those Americans "facing the risks of a future clouded with terror," said company Spokesperson Kenneth Trunk-Jones. The new policies are available as of today. "They will be comprehensive and flexible," Trunk-Jones said. "No American need worry any longer that he or she faces the future unprotected." The company's new plan will provide coverage for any and all loss of life or injury resulting from a terrorist act committed inside the contiguous 48 states of the USA. "No matter where you are, no matter what you’re doing, so long as you are in the Lower 48 when the act occurs, you’ll be covered," the spokesperson said. Lloyd’s is world famous for its unusual policies. "From show girls legs to nuclear materials, we’ve insured just about everything," Trunk-Jones said. "In particular, we have a long history in counter-terror coverage." "For instance, we’ve been covering corporate executives against kidnappers' ransoms for years in Latin America," he said. Determining the premium for this terror coverage created no "truly unusual issues," according to plan actuary Neil Talbot. "No, this is not that different from other coverages," Talbot said. The plan's introduction comes as the US braces for war in the Persian Gulf- a conflict the current administration directly connects to the country’s terror risks. According to Trunk-Jones, however, the timing of the plan's introduction had "nothing to do with the Iraq war." "Lloyd’s is hardly in the headline-grabbing business," he said. When asked about a $90 billion cost estimate for the impending Iraq war (or about 300 dollars per American), Talbot said, "I guess one could weigh the cost of our plan against the cost of a war with Iraq." "The war looks a bit steep from that angle," Talbot added playfully. As to any difference the war itself might make in future terror risks, Talbot said the difference would be "negligible," and that, "we actually considered this quite extensively." According to the actuary, the company concluded that there would be no reduction in risk if the US "took out Saddam Hussein." "Not even an easy go over there seems to us likely to change the threat outlook at home much, I’m afraid," Talbot said. "On balance, if anything, the war over there might increase risks." The new plan's rates are for one year’s coverage. "As is our usual procedure in such things, these rates are always subject to change," said Trunk-Jones. "Lloyds constantly reviews its rates in the light of experience." Asked if the nation as a whole could be insured, Trunk-Jones answered, "Yes, if the US gov applied for a blanket policy, one covering all Americans, certainly we’d take it." "And the rates would be considerably lower," Talbot added. Asked what it would cost America to cover itself, Talbot said, "A quick guess would be 5-7 billion dollars, but if you read this, don’t hold me to it, Mr. Bush. I could be off by a few billion." |
related articles |
00 | June 27, 2003- "Big Terror" Pact May Be Sheilding US Homeland | |
00 | March 20, 2003- Insurance Co., Security Experts Face Off Over Terror Risk Assessment |
|
00 | 00 | |
00 | 00 |